Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript

[I. Call to Order.]

[00:00:06]

GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE.

THIS IS THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE DECATUR PLANNING COMMISSION FOR APRIL THE 11TH, 2023.

MY NAME IS HAROLD BUCKLEY AND I WILL BE CHAIRING THE COMMISSION THIS EVENING.

THIS IS A SEVEN MEMBER COMMISSION OF DECATUR RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION.

THIS COMMISSION HEARS APPLICATIONS FOR LAND USE AND ZONING CHANGES, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AND LAND SUBDIVISIONS.

IT ALSO REVIEWS AND RECOMMENDS CHANGES TO THE CITY'S ZONING REGULATIONS AND FUTURE LAND USE PLANS.

I WOULD LIKE TO ACQUAINT YOU WITH THE PROCEDURES THIS COMMISSION FOLLOWS IN THE CONDUCT OF ITS MEETINGS.

WE WILL HEAR APPLICATIONS TONIGHT IN THE ORDER THEY ARE LISTED ON THE PRINTED AGENDA.

APPLICANTS ARE GIVEN TIME TO PRESENT THEIR CASE WHEN THEIR APPLICATION IS CALLED.

SUPPORTING AND OPPOSING PARTIES ARE ALSO GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT THEIR REMARKS TO THE COMMISSION.

PLEASE BE SURE TO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS BEFORE BEGINNING YOUR REMARKS.

SINCE THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON THE APPLICANT TO CONVINCE THE COMMISSION TO VOTE IN THEIR FAVOR.

APPLICANTS ARE ALSO ALLOWED TO PRESENT REBUTTAL TO ANY OPPOSITION AGAINST THEM.

OPPOSING PARTIES ARE NOT GRANTED AN OPPORTUNITY FOR REBUTTAL.

WE DO NOT NORMALLY LIMIT THE TIME FOR MULTIPLE PARTIES TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION TO AN APPLICATION, BUT GIVEN THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT I THINK WILL WANT TO SPEAK THIS EVENING PURSUANT TO OUR RULES OF PROCEDURE, I AM GOING TO LIMIT THE TIME FOR EACH PERSON.

IF THERE ARE MULTIPLE PEOPLE TO SPEAK ON ONE SIDE OR THE OTHER, I'M GOING TO LIMIT THE TIME FOR EACH PERSON TO THREE MINUTES.

WHEN YOU HIT THE TWO MINUTE MARK, I WILL DO THIS SO THAT YOU KNOW THAT YOU NEED TO START WRAPPING IT UP.

BUT PLEASE REFRAIN FROM ANY APPLAUSE OR DIALOG DURING OR AFTER PRESENTATIONS.

ALL REMARKS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO THE COMMISSION AND WE ASK YOU TO REFRAIN FROM ENGAGING ANYONE ELSE DIRECTLY.

PLEASE SHOW THE SAME RESPECT TO ANYONE WHO IS SPEAKING THAT YOU WOULD EXPECT TO RECEIVE YOURSELF.

LET ME REPEAT THAT.

PLEASE SHOW THE SAME RESPECT TO ANYONE WHO IS SPEAKING THAT YOU WOULD EXPECT TO RECEIVE YOURSELF.

I WISH THAT I DID NOT HAVE TO SAY THIS, BUT THE MOMENT ANYONE STARTS LEVELING ACCUSATIONS OR CALLING PEOPLE NAMES OR ENGAGING IN ANY BEHAVIOR LIKE THAT, I AM GOING TO SHUT YOU DOWN AND INVITE YOU TO GO REDISCOVER YOUR SEAT.

WE ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE A REPEAT OF THE SHAMEFUL BEHAVIOR THAT WE SAW WHEN THIS BODY HELD THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING.

WE ARE NOT DOING THAT TONIGHT.

SO JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT THAT.

THE PLANNING COMMISSION RENDERS FINAL DECISIONS ON SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS, BUT IT MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS ON ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS TO THE CITY COMMISSION, WHICH HAS FINAL DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY ON THOSE CASES.

WE ARE SUPPORTED THIS EVENING BY ANGELA THREADGILL, OUR DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.

AND AT THIS TIME, I WOULD ASK MY FELLOW PLANNING COMMISSIONERS TO INTRODUCE THEMSELVES STARTING AT MY FAR RIGHT.

GOOD EVENING I'M GREG CHILIK.

GOOD EVENING, JOE GRECO.

HELLO, MIKE TRAVIS.

HELLO JOHN MCFARLAND.

RACHEL COGBURN. GOOD EVENING.

JASON FRIEDLANDER.

ALL RIGHT. SO TURNING TO THE AGENDA, WE HAVE ONE ITEM OF UNFINISHED BUSINESS, WHICH IS THE APPROVAL OF OUR MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 14TH MEETING

[II.a. Approval of Minutes from March 14, 2023 scheduled meeting]

AS EVERYONE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE MINUTES.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY CORRECTIONS OR CONCERNS, REVISIONS ABOUT THE MINUTES? HEARING NONE. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED? SO MOVED. THEY DO.

WE HAVE A SECOND. SECOND, IT HAS BEEN PROPERLY MOVED AND SECONDED THAT WE ADOPT THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? ALL RIGHT, THEN LET US LET US MOVE ON TO THE VOTE.

ALL IN FAVOR. SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ANY ABSTENTIONS? ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE TWO ABSTENTIONS.

THE MINUTES ARE HEREBY ADOPTED.

WE HAVE TWO RELATED CASES ON THE AGENDA THIS EVENING.

ANGELA, DO YOU CAN WE COMBINE THESE INTO A SINGLE DISCUSSION SINCE THEY ARE OKAY?

[III.a. Smarties Academy c/o Bogumila Kabat, owner, has requested an amendment to a previously approved conditional use permit to increase the enrollment of a daycare at 465 Clairemont Avenue.]

[III.b. Smarties Academy c/o Bogumila Kabat, owner, has requested an amendment to a previously approved comprehensive site development plan to expand operations of a daycare at 465 Clairemont Avenue.]

SO I WILL CALL THEM BOTH AT THE SAME TIME.

THE FIRST APPLICATION IS BY SMARTIES ACADEMY CARE OF AND PLEASE EXCUSE ME IF I DO NOT GET YOUR NAME RIGHT.

CARE OF BOGUMILA CABAT OWNER WHO HAS REQUESTED AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO INCREASE THE ENROLLMENT OF A DAYCARE AT 465 CLAREMONT AVENUE.

THE SAME APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COMPREHENSIVE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO EXPAND OPERATIONS OF A DAYCARE AT

[00:05:01]

THE SAME ADDRESS.

SO YOU NOW HAVE THE FLOOR.

GO AHEAD AND AND MAKE YOUR PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU. MY NAME IS BOGUMILA KABAT.

I'M THE FOUNDER AND THE OWNER OF SMARTIES ACADEMY IN DECATUR.

I'M HERE TODAY AND I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE REQUEST TO DEFER FOR ONE MORE CYCLE TO TO ALLOW MORE TIME FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD COORDINATION AND PLAN UPDATES BASED ON OUR COMMUNICATION WITH OUR NEIGHBORS AND COMMUNICATION WITH CITY OF STAFF.

WE WILL BE WE WILL BE UPDATING THE COMPREHENSIVE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ADDRESSING SITE SPECIFICS AND REVISE THAT PLAN ACCORDINGLY BASED ON THOSE CONCERNS.

SO I WOULD LIKE TO ASK TO DEFER FOR ONE MORE CYCLE.

AND WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF INVITING ALL OUR NEIGHBORS.

SO THANK YOU SO MUCH TO EVERYONE FOR US, PLEASE.

I'M SORRY FOR COMING, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO INVITE EVERYONE.

I JUST DON'T HAVE EVERYBODY'S INFORMATION, SO I'D BE HAPPY TO PASS MY CONTACTS EMAIL ADDRESS.

SO THIS WAY WE CAN SHARE THE CONCERNS OF OUR NEIGHBORS AND SHARE WITH THEM WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE.

BUT BASED ON OUR FEEDBACK, WE WILL.

WE ARE WORKING ON SITE PLANS UPDATES.

OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION? ALL RIGHT. WHILE WE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'VE REQUESTED A DEFERRAL, APPARENTLY THAT MESSAGE DIDN'T MAKE IT TO A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO'VE COME HERE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HEARING TODAY.

SO I DON'T THINK THAT IT WOULD BE VERY EQUITABLE NOT TO ALLOW THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.

SO AT THIS TIME, I'M GOING TO ASK, IS THERE ANY I MEAN, LET ME ASK AGAIN, IS THERE ANYONE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT? OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION? OKAY. SO WE WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE FLOOR TO FOLKS WHO WANT TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION.

WE REMEMBER BEFORE YOU START YOUR REMARKS, AFTER YOU GET TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS SO THAT WE CAN RECORD THAT AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES PER PERSON TO PROVIDE YOUR REMARKS.

YOU CAN SEE IT. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. YOU HAD HER WAITING ON YOU.

OH, SORRY. I'M TRYING TO FIND MY TIMER.

MY TIMER? TIMER? YES, PLEASE. OKAY, LET'S GET THE TIMER UP AND RUNNING, AND THEN WE WILL BE READY.

OH, LOOK AT THAT. HE'S GOT A BIG OL SCREEN.

I'M JOHNNY ON THE SPOT WITH THE TECHNOLOGY, AS YOU CAN SEE.

ALL RIGHT. THE FIRST PERSON WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION, PLEASE COME FORWARD.

OKAY. AND IN THE INTEREST OF TIME, ANYONE ELSE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION, IF YOU WOULD LINE UP ON THAT SIDE OF THE ROOM SO THAT WE CAN JUST, YOU KNOW, MORE EFFICIENTLY HEAR FROM ANYONE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK.

GO AHEAD. GOOD EVENING.

THANKS FOR LISTENING TO ME.

MY NAME IS CONNIE DAVIS MOORE AND I LIVE AT 219 LUCERNE STREET.

I ATTENDED CLAREMONT SCHOOL AND I'M A PROUD GRADUATE OF DECATUR HIGH SCHOOL.

I'M HERE IN RESPECTFUL BUT FIRM OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF SMARTIES CHILD CARE CENTER.

IN THE SPIRIT OF TRANSPARENCY AND MY COMMITMENT TO DECATUR AS WELL AS EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND THAT COMMUNITY, I WOULD PLEASE LIKE TO LET YOU KNOW THAT MY FAMILY HAS OPERATED A LICENSED CHILD CARE CENTER IN THE CITY OF DECATUR FOR 61 YEARS NOW.

WE JUST CELEBRATED 61 YEARS OF CONTINUOUS OPERATION SUBURBAN NURSERY SCHOOL ON APRIL 2ND.

I HAVE TWO MAIN ISSUES THAT I WOULD LIKE TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION THAT I FEEL THAT I HAVE SOME KNOWLEDGE OF WITH OUR INVOLVEMENT IN THIS PARTICULAR INDUSTRY.

I HAVE THE UTMOST RESPECT FOR CHILD CARE WORKERS AND THE HARD WORK THAT WE DO, AND WE NEED THAT IN GEORGIA.

BUT NUMBER ONE IS THE ISSUE OF AVAILABILITY.

THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS HAS SAID THAT THERE ARE OVER HALF OF LOCATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES THAT HAVE CHILD CARE DESERTS.

THAT IS NOT THE SITUATION IN DECATUR.

HERE WE LIVE AND IF YOU WILL, PLEASE TAKE SOME TIME TO LOOK AT BRIGHT FROM THE START.

THAT'S THE PRODUCT NAME OF GEORGIA'S DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CARE AND LEARNING, DECAL.GA.GOV.

THAT WILL LIST FOR YOU ALL THE LICENSED CHILD CARE CENTERS IN THE STATE OF GEORGIA.

AND YOU CAN DO A LOCATION SEARCH.

AND FROM MY LOCATION AT MY HOME I FOUND THAT WITHIN FIVE MILES THERE ARE WELL MORE THAN 20 CENTERS IN GOOD STANDING WITHIN MY LOCATION. SO FOR OUR PURPOSES TONIGHT, I JUST LOOKED AT SOME CITY OF DECATUR LICENSED CHILD CARE CENTERS.

[00:10:07]

HERE'S THE CAPACITY AND HERE'S THEIR EXISTING OCCUPANCY.

SMARTIES IS LICENSED FOR 146.

THAT'S 35FT² PER CHILD, 64% OCCUPANCY.

FIRST BAPTIST SCHOOL, 225.

THEY HAVE 35% OCCUPANCY.

MY SCHOOL, 113, WE'RE AT 27% OCCUPANCY.

THERE'S PLENTY OF GROWTH AVAILABLE FOR CHILD CARE CENTERS.

NUMBER TWO, WHY AREN'T THEY MORE FULL? BECAUSE BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS JUST PUT OUT THAT WHOLE INDUSTRY HAS SHRUNK BY NEARLY 10%.

100,000 WORKERS HAVE LEFT THIS.

IT'S A VERY LABOR INTENSIVE INDUSTRY BECAUSE OF THE HARD WORKING CONDITIONS, BECAUSE IT'S NOT A HIGH PAYING SITUATION.

THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH EMPLOYEES TO SUPPORT WHAT IS ALREADY THERE.

IT'S NOT VIABLE TO HAVE A LARGE LOCATION WITH SOME 300 CHILDREN.

WE HAVE ALREADY AVAILABLE CHILD CARE CENTER AND THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO ME TONIGHT.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

THANK YOU. NO APPLAUSE.

NO APPLAUSE, PLEASE.

GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS GEORGE LAWS 510 CLAREMONT AVENUE.

LONG TIME RESIDENT OF THIS COMMUNITY.

HAPPILY SO.

THERE'S SO MANY PROBLEMS, I THINK WITH THIS REQUEST FOR THE AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING ZONING ON THIS PROPERTY.

I DON'T KNOW WHERE TO BEGIN.

BUT LET'S START WITH THE FACT THAT CLAREMONT AVENUE IS CONSIDERED ONE OF THE GATEWAYS INTO THE CITY.

THAT'S WHY IT WAS MADE THE FIRST HISTORIC DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF DECATUR LINES, CLAREMONT AVENUE TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT EXIST ON AND AROUND CLAREMONT AVENUE.

IT IS NOT A COMMERCIAL AVENUE.

IT IS A RESIDENTIAL AVENUE.

AND FOR YEARS AND YEARS AND YEARS WE HAD A CHURCH.

I LIVE ACROSS THE STREET FROM IT.

IT WAS WONDERFUL.

AND NOW WE HAVE A COMMERCIAL INSTITUTION.

FINE. THERE IS ALREADY AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ON THAT STREET.

CHILDREN HAVE TO GET TO THAT SCHOOL EVERY DAY.

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT 600 CAR TRIPS A DAY FOR THE INCREASED ENROLLMENT THAT IS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT.

600 CAR TRIPS A DAY.

THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE STAFF.

THERE'S ALSO SOME TALK IN HER PROPOSAL FOR A COFFEE SHOP OR SOME KIND OF SOCIAL GATHERING AREA, WHICH WOULD MEAN INCREASED TRAFFIC ON TOP OF THE STUDENT TRAFFIC.

SO IT BECOMES A COMMERCIAL INSTITUTION RIGHT IN THE HEART OF A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND I REALLY, REALLY THINK THAT WITH THE DENSITY AND THE GROWTH OF WHAT WE'VE SEEN IN DECATUR, ESPECIALLY IN OUR DOWNTOWN DISTRICT, WHERE WE HAVE A LOT OF GROWTH, A LOT OF INCREASED DENSITY, THERE'S MORE AND MORE TRAFFIC THAT WAS JUST APPROVED TO HAVE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING IN THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, WHICH MANY OF US LONGTIME RESIDENTS, WHEN WE FIRST MOVED TO THIS COMMUNITY, IT WAS FULL OF MULTI HOUSING.

WE FOUGHT TO MAKE IT SINGLE FAMILY AND NOW WE WANT TO SEE MORE INCREASE IN DENSITY.

I DON'T THINK WE DO. WE WANT TO KEEP OUR NEIGHBORHOODS FOR FAMILIES.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

HELLO, I'M JULIA BROWN, LIVE AT 128 ERIE AVENUE.

I ALSO AM A LONG TIME RESIDENT OF DECATUR.

I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

I KNOW IT'S NOT EASY AND THIS IS PARTICULARLY A HARD DECISION BECAUSE YOU HAVE COMPETING INTERESTS.

QUALITY DAYCARE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS.

BUT THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT QUALITY DAYCARE VERSUS QUALITY OF LIFE IN OUR RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS.

THIS IS A COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE THAT BOGNA IS PROPOSING.

WHAT SHE PLANS TO BUILD IS BIGGER THAN THE EXISTING CHURCH.

WHAT SHE PLANS TO BUILD WILL OVERWHELM THE CHURCH, AND I'M INTERESTED TO SEE HER CHANGES.

BUT I DO THINK IT WILL FOREVER CHANGE THE QUALITY OF OUR LIFE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD TO HAVE SUCH A HUGE DEVELOPMENT ON THAT CHURCH PROPERTY.

AND THERE'S REALLY NOT ENOUGH ROOM ON THAT PROPERTY TO SEPARATE TO HAVE A SETBACK FROM THE THE BUILDING AND THE HOMES AND STILL HAVE ROOM TO DO WHAT SHE IS PROPOSING TO DO.

SO THAT'S NUMBER ONE.

NUMBER TWO, I CANNOT IMAGINE WHAT IT'S GOING TO BE LIKE WHEN SHE STARTS CONSTRUCTION.

[00:15:03]

I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU COULD CONTINUE TO RUN THE SCHOOL AND CONSTRUCT A BUILDING THAT IS BIGGER THAN THE EXISTING CHURCH ITSELF, PARTICULARLY GIVING THE LIMITED SPACE ON THAT LOT WHERE SHE CAN STAGE AND PUT PRODUCTS AND THERE'S GOING TO BE A TON OF GRADING.

IT'S JUST GOING TO BE A NIGHTMARE FOR ALL OF US FOR QUITE A LONG TIME.

THAT IN AND OF ITSELF, NOT TO MENTION WHAT IT WILL BE LIKE ONCE IT'S DONE.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

HELLO, MY NAME IS MARK BROWN.

I LIVE AT 128 ERIE AVENUE.

I AM A LONG TIME RESIDENT AND LOVE DECATUR.

FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK.

I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH THE TWO SPEAKERS BEFORE ME.

THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD ADD IS ONCE THAT STRUCTURE GOES IN, IT'S GOING TO BE INCREDIBLY HARD TO CHANGE.

AND I THINK YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE FORESIGHT TO ANTICIPATE THE IMPACT THIS BUILDING WILL HAVE AND THE GROWTH OF STUDENTS WILL HAVE ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH ERIE AVENUE, BUT IT IS A SMALL STREET.

IT'S VERY NARROW.

IT WAS BUILT IN THE 20 THE 30S, AND IT'S NOT REALLY MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THIS KIND OF GROWTH.

KEEP IN MIND, AS THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER INDICATED, WE HAVE A ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AT THE END OF THE ROAD AND THEN SHE'S GOING TO ADD CARE FOR AN ADDITIONAL 300 STUDENTS.

THE TRAFFIC THAT WILL CREATE WILL BE IRREPARABLE IN TERMS OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE I WOULD MAINTAIN.

IT COULD ACTUALLY IMPACT THE VALUE OF THE HOMES AS WELL, TOO.

THE OTHER THING, ONE LAST COMMENT I'D LIKE TO MAKE FOR YOU TO CONSIDER.

EVEN THOUGH SHE MAY MAKE CHANGES TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE BUILDING, THE TRUE ONE OF THE TRUE IMPACTS ARE THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS AND THE SERVICES THAT ARE BEING PROVIDED. I ASK THAT THAT BE CONSIDERED AND EVALUATED IN ADDITION TO WHATEVER CHANGES SHE MAY MAKE TO THE BUILDING.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME AND THANKS FOR LISTENING TO ME.

THANK YOU. HELLO, MY NAME IS GAYLE DOYLE AND I LIVE AT 449 CLAREMONT.

I'M READING SOME COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF MY LANDLORD WHO COULD NOT BE HERE TONIGHT, BUT I ALSO AGREE WITH THESE COMMENTS.

SO IT'S A BIT OF A TWO FOR ONE.

AS A 20 YEAR RESIDENT OF THE HISTORIC DECATUR AREA, I'M STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THE CURRENT SMARTIES ACADEMY EXPANSION PROPOSAL.

THE OWNER'S APPLICATION CLAIMS THAT THE DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE NO ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTY.

THIS FAILS TO RECOGNIZE THE FOLLOWING ONE THE REVIEW BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE IDENTIFIED FIVE AREAS THAT ARE NOT COMPLIANT WITH THE CITY OF DECATUR'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION GUIDING PRINCIPLES.

THE PROPOSED ADDITION TALL, LARGE MODERN DESIGN IS NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HISTORIC DISTRICTS REQUIREMENTS.

THE APPLICATION FAILS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE IMPACT ON SAFETY FOR DECATUR NEIGHBORHOOD CHILDREN WALKING AND BIKING TO AND FROM LOCAL DECATUR ELEMENTARY, MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOLS ALONG CLAREMONT AND ERIE.

THE DEVELOPMENT INCREASES TRAFFIC FLOW AND CONGESTION THROUGHOUT THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, IMPACTING NOT ONLY CLAREMONT AVENUE AND ERIE STREET, BUT RESIDENTS OF THE ENTIRE GREAT LAKES NEIGHBORHOOD.

FOR A CHANGING PRIVATE CHURCH PARKING LOT INTO AN EXPANDED COMMERCIAL LOT OF 75 OR MORE SPACES.

EXTENDING TO THE EDGE OF THE 449 CLAREMONT PROPERTY LINE DIRECTLY ALTERS THE RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE 12 FAMILIES RESIDING IN BUILDINGS J.

K AND L. FIVE SMARTIES ACADEMY HAS ALREADY BEEN FINED FOR IMPROPERLY CUTTING DOWN TREES AND REMOVING MATURE TREES BEHIND J AND K, AND NOW THEY PROPOSE TO REMOVE AN ADDITIONAL 30 TREES.

THE EXPANSION OF THE PARKING LOT DIRECTLY ALTERS THE RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE 12 FAMILIES RESIDING IN BUILDINGS J, K AND L BY INVADING THEIR PERSONAL SPACE AND DEPRIVING DEPRIVING THEM OF THEIR PRIVACY.

THE OPERATION OF THE SCHOOL WILL ENTAIL PARKING LOT IMPACTS SUCH AS AIR AND NOISE POLLUTION FROM CARS, PEOPLE COMING AND GOING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AREA THROUGHOUT THE DAY AND EVENING HOURS IMPACTING THE NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTS.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

VIRGINIA PEREZ, CITY OF DECATUR RESIDENT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

I AM MARIA ALVAREZ AND I RESIDE AT 449 CLAREMONT AVENUE.

AND I JUST WANT TO I HAD A HUGE ONE, BUT KEEP IT SHORT.

ALL RIGHT. SO THE MAIN THING THAT I WANT TO BE CONCERNED HERE ABOUT IS ABOUT SEVEN MONTHS AGO WHEN I SPOKE, I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE TREES.

AND THE ATTORNEY VERBATIM SAID, WE ARE ASKING JUST WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR RIGHT NOW.

ABOUT TWO WEEKS LATER OR SO, THE TREES DISAPPEARED.

SO MAYBE I CAN FORESEE THE FUTURE.

[00:20:03]

I DON'T KNOW. MY WISH.

BUT ANYWAY, SO I WANT TO POINT OUT WHAT THE PROBLEMS ARE HERE.

AND WE HAVE A MASTER PLAN THAT WE NEED TO ADHERE.

SO BECAUSE IT'S SOMETHING THAT ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF DECATUR PITCH IN WITH, AND HERE'S THE THE ONES THAT SOME OF THE CODES OR SOME OF THE ACTIONS THAT WE TAKE FOR THE MASTER PLAN THAT THIS GOES AGAINST.

AND SOME OF YOU MIGHT NOT BE FAMILIAR, THE MASTER PLAN IS ACTUALLY ON THE CITY OF DECATUR ON THERE IS A HUGE PAMPHLET AND I KNOW MISS ANGELA HAS TOLD ME.

HAVE YOU READ IT? YES, SOME OF IT, I WOULD SAY SO.

ANYWAY, THE FIRST ONE IS CA ONE.

ESTABLISH GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION AND CLEAN ENERGY TARGETS.

AND I CAN GO ON ON HOW.

TONS OF OTHER VEHICLES ARE GOING TO IMPACT THAT CAR.

EIGHT. EVALUATE THE CARBON IMPACT OF THE CITY DECISION.

K11 EDUCATE THE COMMUNITY ON TRUE SUSTAINABILITY AND WE NO LONGER HAVE TREES AND SO FORTH.

CA 22, INCREASE THE TREE CANOPY GOAL.

THE TREES ARE GONE. AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE CA 26, REQUIRE CARBON FOOTPRINT DOCUMENTATION WITH BUILDING PERMITS APPLICATION.

AMANDA HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING REQUIREMENT OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE SIMPLE DOCUMENTATION BASED ON CONSTRUCTION TYPE EMBODIED ENERGY.

AND I CAN KEEP ON READING BECAUSE THIS IS STRAIGHT UP FROM THE FROM THE PLAN.

THE NEXT ONE IS CA 27, IMPLEMENT THE STORM MASTER PLAN.

THEN WE HAVE CA 28 UPDATE THE COMMUNITY FORESTRY MANAGEMENT PLAN.

CA 30.

ENCOURAGE USEABLE GREEN SPACE IN NEW DEVELOPMENTS.

AND THEN SINCE I AM A LATINA, I ALSO I AM ALL ABOUT EQUITABLE.

OKAY. AND SO FOR FOR THE EQUITY OF THIS, IT'S LIKE, YOU KNOW, MOST PEOPLE IN DECATUR, THE AVERAGE OF HER SCHOOL IS 1800.

SO I'M GOING TO LEAVE YOU WITH THIS NOTE.

AN INCREASE OF APPROXIMATELY 150 KIDS AT THE CHEAPEST RATE ON THERE.

IT WOULD INCREASE $3.3 MILLION OF REVENUE.

AND I CAN SEE WHERE THE PERSON'S GOING WITH THIS BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO MAKE MONEY, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE GOING TO PUT MORE KIDS IN THE SAME SPACE, WHAT IS THE ACTUAL HOW, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE CRAMMING THESE KIDS IN THERE.

BUT OF COURSE, THERE IS LIKE THIS EXPANSION THAT WE'RE ALL TALKING ABOUT.

SO I JUST WANT TO LEAVE YOU AT THAT AND THANK YOU FOR LISTENING.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. YEAH.

GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS RICHARD HERZOG.

EXCUSE ME. AND I LIVE AT 455 CLAREMONT, WHICH IS THE PROPERTY ADJOINING THE CHURCH ON TWO SIDES.

THE CHURCH OR THE SCHOOL PROPERTY, EXCUSE ME, IS BESIDE OUR HOUSE AND BEHIND IT.

I UNDERSTAND THAT BOGNER IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE, AND SO I DON'T WANT.

GO TOO FAR HERE.

BUT WE HAVE HAD SOME LENGTHY DISCUSSIONS WITH HER ABOUT THE SCHOOL.

AND I'D LIKE TO SAY THAT I LIKE THE SCHOOL.

THEY'VE BEEN IT'S A GOOD NEIGHBOR.

SHE'S BEEN A GOOD NEIGHBOR.

I LIKE THE SOUND OF THE KIDS NEXT DOOR.

BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAD DISCUSSED, WHICH IS NOT IN THE CURRENT PLAN, WAS THE TREES IN THE BACK.

THERE'S TWO ENORMOUS HOLLY TREES.

HOLLY BUSHES THAT HAVE GROWN INTO TREES.

THESE ARE GENERATIONAL PLANTS.

I MEAN, THEY'RE 40, 50FT HIGH, TOO, WHICH I UNDERSTAND THE REVISIONS WILL PRESERVE.

AND THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER TREES, AND I UNDERSTAND THERE WILL ALSO BE A GREEN SPACE, BUT IT IS NOT IN THE CURRENT PLAN.

AND SO I WANTED TO SAY THAT BASED ON THAT, I'M OPPOSED TO TO THE CURRENT PLAN.

NEXT SPEAKER. HELLO, MY NAME IS ROBYN PIFER.

I LIVE AT 450 CLAREMONT AVENUE.

I AM DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET, ACROSS CLAREMONT AVENUE FROM THE BACKSIDE OF THE CHURCH, AND I SPOKE AT THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE MEETING, SO I WON'T GO OVER THAT AGAIN, ALTHOUGH I DID FIND A READING, WHICH I'M HAPPY TO EMAIL YOU ALL FROM A HISTORICAL SOCIETY THAT DID A REVIEW OF THE CHURCH THAT COMMENTS ON THE SPECIFIC ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES THAT ARE UNIQUE TO IT.

AND WHAT THE.

UM, UPDATES SHOULD HAVE REFLECTED, BUT I WANTED TO FOCUS ON THE TRAFFIC AND SAFETY ISSUE FOR MY COUPLE OF MINUTES LIVING ON CLAREMONT

[00:25:07]

AVENUE. I'M AT THE CORNER OF PONCE PLACE AND CLAREMONT AVENUE, AND MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY WE HEAR SCREECHING TIRES AT THAT INTERSECTION OF PONCE PLACE AND CLAREMONT, WHICH IS RIGHT BY THE PRESCHOOL.

IT IS OFTEN BACKED UP THE TRAFFIC BACKS UP FROM COMMERCE ALL THE WAY BACK TO THE CHURCH IN PONCE PLACE.

IT IS PEOPLE ARE SPEEDING DOWN CLAREMONT AVENUE COMING TOWARD THE CITY.

IN FACT, SOMEBODY JUST RECENTLY, YOU KNOW, TO AVOID SOMEONE MAKING A LEFT TURN OFF OF PONCE PLACE, SOMEBODY SPEEDING DOWN CLAREMONT HOPPED THE CURB AND TOOK OUT OUR FRONT ALUMINUM FENCE.

AND SO IT'S JUST NOT IT CONCERNS ME GREATLY TO THINK ABOUT PUTTING MORE KIDS THERE, HAVING MORE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC, POSSIBLY HAVING MORE CAR TRAFFIC.

I CAN'T IMAGINE HOW YOU'RE GOING TO GET 300 KIDS, YOU KNOW, OUT OF THAT ONE LITTLE EXIT THAT IS ON CLAREMONT AVENUE.

IF SOMEBODY TRIED TO MAKE A LEFT TURN, IT WOULD BE A DISASTER.

I JUST I THINK THERE ARE A LOT OF TRAFFIC ISSUES THAT WOULD COME OUT OF THIS.

I WAS THE PTA PRESIDENT FOR CLAREMONT ELEMENTARY ABOUT TEN YEARS AGO, AND I PLANNED A LOT OF EVENTS, INCLUDING HOLIDAY MARKETPLACE.

AND ANYONE WHO HAS BEEN TO HOLIDAY MARKETPLACE KNOWS THAT IT IS IT IS A TRAFFIC NIGHTMARE.

WHEN YOU WHEN YOU TRY AND INCREASE ALL THAT ALL THOSE CARS ONTO THAT LITTLE ROAD, PEOPLE WOULD END UP PARKING ON PONCE PLACE AND RUNNING ACROSS CLAREMONT AVENUE.

AND I SEE KIDS DO IT STILL LIKE TODAY WHEN THEY ARE, YOU KNOW, IF THEY CAN'T FIND PARKING ON ERIE AND THEY PARK ON PONCE PLACE AND THEY RUN ACROSS THE STREET. SO IT'S JUST.

REALLY CONCERNS ME TO DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF KIDS THAT ARE IN THAT PRESCHOOL.

AND THE OTHER THING THAT I WANTED TO MENTION IS THAT I JUST DID A QUICK SEARCH OF THE PRESCHOOLS IN THE AREA LOOKING AT CAPACITY.

AND TO MY KNOWLEDGE, FROM WHAT I SAW, THIS WOULD BE BY FAR THE LARGEST PRESCHOOL IN THE CITY OF DECATUR AND THE SURROUNDING AREAS.

IT WOULD HAVE MORE KIDS THAN CLAREMONT ELEMENTARY, WHICH IS A KNOW K THROUGH TWO.

AND, YOU KNOW, THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF KIDS THAT I FOUND WAS ABOUT 100.

THERE WERE QUITE A FEW WHO HAD LESS AND THERE WERE QUITE A FEW WHO HAD A LITTLE MORE.

BUT YOU KNOW, THAT'S TIME.

OKAY. SORRY. THE MAX WAS 200, SO THIS WOULD BE QUITE A BIT BIGGER.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

GOOD EVENING. I'M KATE LAWS AND I LIVE AT 510 CLAREMONT AVENUE.

I'VE BEEN A RESIDENT OVER 25 YEARS, JOYFULLY ACROSS FROM THE CHURCH AND WATCHED IT HAVE DIFFERENT PRESCHOOLS COME AT DIFFERENT TIMES AND EVOLVE AND NEVER OBJECTED TO THAT.

HOWEVER, IN THIS CASE I DO NOT SEE HOW IT IS FEASIBLE TO INCREASE THE CAPACITY OR NOR WHY WOULD ANYONE IN DECATUR WANT TO INCREASE THE CAPACITY IN THE MIDDLE OF A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD? WE ARE STILL ADJUSTING TO THE HIGH DENSITY OF BUILDINGS THAT HAVE NOT HAD RESIDENTS MOVE INTO IT YET.

MY TEN MINUTE COMMUTE TO WORK, WHICH IS TWO MILES AWAY, HAS INCREASED TO 25 MINUTES.

UH, WITH PERHAPS, I HOPE, BECAUSE OF THE ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND THAT WILL EASE.

I ALSO QUESTION THE EXPANSION OF USES.

IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING, AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE PROPOSAL, IT'S QUITE A FINANCIAL INVESTMENT THAT THEY'LL BE ADDING CAMPS AND THINGS DURING DIFFERENT TIMES OF THE YEAR TO HELP PARENTS OR TO SEEK OUT NEW, NEW PARTICIPANTS, NEW FAMILIES TO ATTEND.

AND I THINK THAT I THINK THAT WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE.

RIGHT. ALSO, THE QUALITY OF LIFE ISSUE THAT WAS RAISED BY MY FELLOW NEIGHBORS, I THINK IS REALLY NOT TO BE OVERLOOKED BY THE BY DOUBLING THE CAPACITY.

I THINK 148 IS A GREAT NUMBER.

I THINK WE'RE HANDLING IT.

AND I ALSO WOULD QUESTION THEIR PLANS FOR DROP OFF AND PICK UP.

THEY USED TO HAVE A LINE WHERE THEY DROPPED OFF AND PICKED UP AND NOW I THINK THE PARENTS GO INSIDE.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE.

BUT ANYWAY, I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

[00:30:02]

GOOD EVENING, MARC. ETHAN.

I RESIDE AT 316 SUPERIOR AVENUE.

WANT TO TAKE AN OPPORTUNITY TO THINK OF SORT OF THE BIG PICTURE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COMMISSION'S ROLE IN THE APPROVAL PROCESS OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. WHEN I THINK OF INSTITUTIONAL ZONING, I THINK OF CHURCHES, MUSEUMS, PUBLIC SCHOOLS, USUALLY OWNED OR MANAGED BY BOARDS.

PROFIT IS TYPICALLY NOT THE MOTIVATION BEHIND THESE GROUPS.

I I'M ON THE EXECUTIVE BOARD FOR LEGACY PARK AND WE TAKE VERY SERIOUSLY ANY APPLICATIONS FOR USE WITHIN THE PROPERTY BEFORE IT WOULD EVEN GET TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMITTING PROCESS.

WHEN I THINK ABOUT HOW THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, WHEN HELD BY A PRIVATE BUSINESS OWNER IN AN INSTITUTIONAL OCCUPANCY, CAN CHANGE AND AFFECT THE VALUE OF A PROPERTY.

IT GIVES ME CONCERN.

ON A PERFECT EXAMPLE IS IF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WAS APPROVED FOR 300 STUDENTS, THAT PROPERTY IS MORE VALUABLE TOMORROW THAN IT WAS TODAY AT 148 STUDENTS.

IS THAT REALLY THE POINT OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITTING PROCESS TO, IN ESSENCE CHANGE THE SUB USE OF ZONING WITHIN AN INSTITUTIONAL OCCUPANCY? I DON'T THINK THAT A MUSEUM OR A CHURCH, IF YOU APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, IS GOING TO RAISE THE PROPERTY VALUE CONSIDERABLY BECAUSE THE OVERALL ARCHING MISSION OF THAT INSTITUTION IS DIFFERENT THAN IF IT'S A PRIVATELY HELD FOR PROFIT BUSINESS.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

MY NAME IS DEBORAH PAINTER AND I LIVE AT 320 SUPERIOR AVENUE.

PROBABLY LIVE.

PROBABLY THE FURTHEST AWAY FROM THE SCHOOL.

BUT I WALK PAST THAT.

I WALK DOWN ERIE AVENUE EVERY DAY WALKING MY DOG.

I ENJOY THE.

THE WILDLIFE, THE BIRDS, EVERYTHING.

TAKE ALL THAT STUFF AWAY.

I THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE A TRAGEDY.

BESIDES THE FACT THAT.

SOMETIMES I CAN'T CROSS SUPERIOR AVENUE BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH TRAFFIC GOING UP AND DOWN SUPERIOR AVENUE NOW.

ONCE YOU ADD THAT CUT THROUGH, ONCE PEOPLE START USING IT AS A CUT THROUGH, IT'S JUST GOING TO BE WORSE.

BUT I WANT TO SEE. HER WEBSITE SAYS SMARTIES ACADEMY IS LOCATED IN DOWNTOWN CITY OF DECATUR.

IT HAS A RICH GREEN SPACE THAT IS USED FOR OUTDOOR PLAY, INCLUDING WATER PLAY IN THE SUMMER MONTHS AND OUTDOOR YOGA.

THERE ARE GARDENS WHERE THE CHILDREN LEARN TO CULTIVATE HERBS AND VEGETABLES AND THESE CROPS ARE ALSO USED IN PREP FOR THEIR MEAL.

SO IF SHE'S GOING TO BE THAT ENVIRONMENTALLY APPRECIATIVE, THEN SHE NEEDS TO LEAVE THE GREEN SPACE AND DO THE TRAFFIC ALONE.

IF SHE'S GOT 148 STUDENTS AND SHE'S DOING IT WELL, THAT'S WHAT SHE NEEDS TO CONTINUE DOING, IS DOING IT WELL AT 148 STUDENTS, BECAUSE WHEN YOU ADD EVERYTHING ELSE WITH 300 STUDENTS, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE DOING IT WELL.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION? YES. I DON'T KNOW IF I'M SPEAKING OPPOSITION OR IN SUPPORT.

CAN WE HAVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS BEFORE YOU BEGIN YOUR REMARKS AND THE MIC? ONE, TWO, FIVE. GREENWOOD PLACE.

I'M A MY DAUGHTER IS AT SMARTIES ACADEMY.

SHE SEEMS VERY HAPPY THERE.

WE'RE HAPPY HER GOING THERE.

I WOULDN'T MIND MORE KIDS ATTENDING SMARTIES ACADEMY, BUT I'M TERRIFIED OF ALL THE TRAFFIC.

I TRY NOT TO DRIVE AS MUCH AS I CAN, BUT THERE'S A LOT OF CARS THAT GO IN, AND I'D LIKE THAT TO BE A CONSIDERATION ABOUT MAKING CLAREMONT NOT A HELLSCAPE WHEN I'M TRYING TO RIDE MY BIKE DOWN.

THANK YOU. THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

TYPICALLY, THIS IS THE POINT AT WHICH WE WOULD INVITE THE APPLICANT BACK UP TO PRESENT REBUTTAL.

BUT CONSIDERING THAT WE HAVE A REQUEST FOR DEFERRAL ON THE TABLE, I THINK IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR US TO DISCUSS THAT.

AND IF WE DECIDE TO DEFER THE APPLICATIONS, THEN WE CAN GO AHEAD AND DISPENSE WITH THESE APPLICATIONS THAT WAY.

BUT IF THERE IS NOT AN APPETITE TO DEFER AT THAT POINT, I THINK WE WOULD INVITE THE APPLICANT BACK UP TO RESPOND TO WHAT WE'VE HEARD TODAY.

IS THAT OKAY WITH YOU? YES.

CONSIDER THE REQUEST TO DEFER BECAUSE WE WILL BE MAKING THE CHANGES TO OUR SITE PLAN AND WE WILL BE ADDRESSING ALL THOSE COMMENTS FROM OUR NEIGHBORS REGARDING THE TRAFFIC.

I HEARD A COUPLE COMMENTS WHICH WHICH WERE NOT TRUE.

SO WE WILL BE ALSO ADDRESSING THEM BASED ON TREES WHICH WE ARE TRYING TO REMOVE AND ESPECIALLY TRAFFIC.

[00:35:07]

WE ARE LOOKING INTO 300 STUDENT BUT TRULY WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE 250 STUDENTS AND HAVE AN OPTION TO HAVE OUR TEACHERS, CHILDREN AND OUR OUR EXISTING FAMILIES CHILDREN FOR THE SUMMER CAMPS DURING THE SUMMER TIME. SO WE CANNOT REQUEST 250 TO 160 STUDENTS ENROLLMENT AND THEN FOR SUMMER TIME INCREASE THE ENROLLMENT AMOUNT. BUT WE WILL WE WILL HAVE ALL THOSE INFORMATIONS IN DETAILS WITH THE NEW UPDATED SITE PLAN.

SO I WILL APPRECIATE IF YOU IF YOU WILL BE ABLE TO DEFER FOR ONE MORE CYCLE.

OKAY. AND WHEN YOU SAY ONE MORE CYCLE, HOW LONG WE WILL SUBMIT ALL THE DOCUMENTS FOR THE MAY MEETING AND YOU THINK YOU CAN GET IT ALL DONE.

AND YES, WE ARE ALREADY WORKING ON IT.

OKAY. WE ALREADY HAVE ALL TRAFFIC STUDIES.

WE MOST OF OUR DOCUMENTS? YES, MOST OF OUR DOCUMENTS.

MOST OF THE STUFF IS DONE.

IT'S JUST WE DIDN'T HAVE TIME TO UPLOAD AND FINALIZE ALL THE SITE PLAN.

SO I WILL REALLY APPRECIATE IF YOU CONSIDER.

OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT. SO NOW IS THE POINT IN THE MEETING WHERE WE SPEAK AMONGST OURSELVES.

I GUESS THE WAY TO ORGANIZE THE DISCUSSION WOULD BE TO TALK ABOUT THE DEFERRAL AND WHETHER THIS BODY HAS AN APPETITE FOR DEFERRING FOR 30 DAYS AS REQUESTED.

I HEARD A LOT OF DIFFERENT TERMS. SAFETY TREES.

SMALL ROADS. TRAFFIC.

RESIDENTIAL STREET CAPACITIES.

POLLUTION. HISTORIC PRESERVATION.

EXPANSION OF USES.

DROP OFF AND PICK UP.

IT'S YOU KNOW, IF THEY CAN ADDRESS SOME OF THOSE THINGS, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY WE'RE NOT VOTING TODAY, SO WE'RE NOT WEIGHING IN FAVOR.

WELL, MAYBE. MAYBE WE HAVEN'T DECIDED YET.

YOU'RE RIGHT. I MEAN, IF THEY IF SHE WANTS TO TAKE A SHOT AT TALKING TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, I DON'T THINK IT BY DEFERRING IT.

I DON'T THINK IT HURTS ANYTHING.

ANYTHING. AND IT WILL AT LEAST GIVE HER THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO THE NEIGHBORS AND THEN THE NEIGHBORS WILL HAVE THE CHANCE TO COME BACK AND REAFFIRM THEIR WHETHER THEIR TERMS HAVE BEEN.

SHE MAY CHANGE HER MIND.

SHE MAY SAY, YOU KNOW WHAT, I DON'T WANT TO GO AFTER 300.

I MAY WANT TO GO AFTER 160.

WHO KNOWS? BUT I WOULD AT LEAST GIVE HER THE CHANCE TO ADDRESS THIS LONG LIST OF ITEMS. I AGREE. DOES ANYBODY HAVE A DIFFERENT THOUGHT? WOULD BE MY INCLINATION.

IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S THE RIGHT OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AND SEE IF THE ADJUSTMENTS ARE PALATABLE TO THE STAKEHOLDERS AND.

TAKE THE NEXT STEP AT THAT APPROPRIATE POINT.

ALL RIGHT. BECAUSE WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT WEIGHING IN FAVOR OR AGAINST IT RIGHT NOW.

NO, NOT NOT RIGHT THIS SECOND.

NO. GIVING THEM THE ALL PARTIES A CHANCE TO WORK, WORK MORE AND MAYBE COME TO A MUTUALLY ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION. OR AT LEAST GET CLOSER.

OR GET CLOSER. YEAH, GET CLOSER.

YEAH. THERE'S A BIG GAP RIGHT NOW.

OKAY. DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY THOUGHTS? BUT DO I HAVE A MOTION TO DEFER THIS APPLICATION FOR 30 DAYS TO OUR NEXT MEETING? OH, SORRY. I WANT TO BE SPECIFIC ABOUT THE DATE.

IT WILL BE TUESDAY, MAY 9TH.

OKAY. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO DEFER? PER THAT REQUEST TO MAY THE 9TH.

I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION.

DOES IT HAVE TO? DOES THE MOTION HAVE TO BE DEFERRED TO A SPECIFIC DATE, OR CAN IT SIMPLY BE DEFERRED? IT DOES, YES.

SO THAT EVERYONE KNOWS WHEN THE NEXT PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE.

OTHERWISE THEY'D HAVE TO TABLE IT.

CORRECT. AND THEN SHE WOULD HAVE TO REFILE EVERYTHING.

SO WE REALLY DO NEED A DATE SPECIFIC TIME.

OKAY. SO DO I HAVE A MOTION TO DEFER THE APPLICATION TO OUR MAY THE 9TH HEARING? I MOVE TO DEFER THE MOTION TO TUESDAY, MAY THE 9TH.

ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. IT HAS BEEN PROPERLY MOVED AND SECONDED THAT WE DEFER THIS APPLICATION TO OUR MAY THE 9TH AGENDA.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS ON THE MOTION? ALL RIGHT. HEARING NONE.

ALL IN FAVOR.

SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE, AYE. ANY OPPOSED ANY ABSTAINS.

ALL RIGHT. THE MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

A PROCEDURAL QUESTION.

YES. IF SHE'S WEARING SOMETHING THAT.

SHE SHE'S NOT RESUBMITTING.

WE'RE JUST DELAYING OUR SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW AND AND RECOMMENDATION UNTIL OUR NEXT MEETING.

[00:40:08]

BUT IT WILL BE THE SAME APPLICATION.

SHE'S ALLOWED TO UPDATE IT.

WELL, I MEAN, IT'LL BE REVISED BASED ON THE DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN NOW AND THEN, BUT IT'S STILL, FOR TECHNICAL PURPOSES, THE SAME APPLICATION. SO.

WELL, NO, NO. AND IF I IF I MAY ADD THAT ANY NEW MATERIALS WE TYPICALLY LIKE TO POST TO THE CITY'S WEB PAGE OR PLANNING COMMISSION WEB PAGE FOR MAY 9TH, ANY UPDATES TO THE STAFF REPORT, ANY NEW APPLICATIONS, SUBMITTAL MATERIALS? ALL THAT GETS UPLOADED TO THE MAY 9TH MEETING PAGE SO THAT EVERYONE CAN PUBLICLY ACCESS THAT, AND WE TYPICALLY LIKE TO DO THAT BY MAY 2ND THE WEEK BEFORE. OKAY.

OKAY, GREAT.

I THINK LET ME LET ME YOUR QUESTION, THOUGH, WAS MORE SPECIFIC.

DO THEY HAVE TO REAPPLY TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BECAUSE OF CHANGES? SO SO WELL, SHE WOULD BE COMING BACK HERE WITH AN ADVERSE RECOMMENDATION.

YOU WANT TO SEND HER BACK TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOR A SHOT AT APPROVAL? SO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION, AND THEY HAVE PROVIDED THEIR COMMENTS AS IT RELATES TO THE ARCHITECTURE.

FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND FROM THE APPLICANT, THEY ARE NOT LOOKING TO UPDATE THEIR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.

IT'S MORE ABOUT THE SITE PLAN AND THE TREES, ETCETERA.

ULTIMATELY, THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS WILL HAVE TO GO BACK BEFORE THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS.

THEY WILL HAVE THE FINAL SAY ON THE ACTUAL ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDINGS, BUT THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION HAS DONE THEIR PART.

THEY HAVE PROVIDED A RECOMMENDATION AND THEY HAVE PROVIDED THEIR CONCERNS WITHIN YOUR DESK PACKET.

KNOW THE MATERIALS THAT YOU ARE ALL PROVIDED WITH.

YOU HAVE THE MEMO AS WELL AS THE MINUTES FROM THEIR MEETING PROVIDING THEIR COMMENTS OF WHY THEY VOTED THE WAY THEY DID FOR THEIR RECOMMENDATION.

ALL RIGHT. THEY HAVE DONE THEIR PART.

SO THAT TAKES CARE OF THOSE TWO APPLICATIONS.

WE DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER SPECIFIC BUSINESS ON THE AGENDA.

ANGELA, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER? I ONLY WANT TO TO SHARE.

I KNOW MR GRECO SERVES ON THE STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN AND CONTINUE TO APPRECIATE HIS TIME SERVING ON THAT COMMITTEE.

WE I DO.

I'M THANKFUL THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE HERE.

WE ARE GOING TO HAVE OUR THIRD AND FINAL COMMUNITY MEETING FOR THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN ON THURSDAY, APRIL 27TH, FROM 630 TO 830 AT THE DECATUR RECREATION CENTER.

THIS IS WHERE WE ARE GOING TO SHARE THE GOALS, THE OBJECTIVES.

WE DO HAVE SOME OPPORTUNITY SITES THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT FOR CONCEPTUAL PLANS.

ALSO SHARING SOME CONCEPTUAL IDEAS FOR THE REDESIGN OF THE DECATUR SQUARE, JUST GIVING IT A REFRESH, NOT A MAJOR OVERHAUL, BUT A REFRESH FOR OUR LIVING ROOM, OUR CITY'S LIVING ROOM, OUR FRONT PORCH.

SO I DO WANT TO INVITE EVERYONE TO THAT COMMUNITY MEETING ON APRIL 27TH, 630, AT DECATUR RECREATION CENTER.

ALL RIGHT. SO SEEING AS HOW WE HAVE NO OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS TO ADDRESS, THIS MEETING IS NOW ADJOURNED.

THANK YOU.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.